Dear Sir,
Shri Sakthiveluvm AD (Tech) Chennai is likely to be filed WP against CAt order and all bench mets are being supported to him.
Pl remit cash of rs 6000/- Six thousand only to Sakthiveluvm his account No is as under
State Bank of India ANNASALAI BRANCH ACCOUNT NO 20018105813.
Please support him and struggle jointly.
Thanks
D K Tripathi
Tuesday, March 30, 2010
Friday, March 19, 2010
email from batchmets
From D R SEN
Yes Dear,
It is un-justice for us. Let's struggle for the same.
Sen
Sr. Postmaster Jodhpur HO
Please arrange to send the copy of the said decision. I am ready to co-operate all the batch officers.
D.R. Sen
Sr. Postmaster
Jodhpur HO
From Patil
Dear Sir,
I am requesting you to intimate the further course of joint action. I think we all should discuss the further strategy
through email.
FROm SS SIRSI
Dear Sir,
I am always with You.Please tell what assistace required from Me.There wll be full support from me.Please go ahead.
Yuors sincerely,
S S Shirsi
SPOsPndharpur 413304
Yes Dear,
It is un-justice for us. Let's struggle for the same.
Sen
Sr. Postmaster Jodhpur HO
Please arrange to send the copy of the said decision. I am ready to co-operate all the batch officers.
D.R. Sen
Sr. Postmaster
Jodhpur HO
From Patil
Dear Sir,
I am requesting you to intimate the further course of joint action. I think we all should discuss the further strategy
through email.
FROm SS SIRSI
Dear Sir,
I am always with You.Please tell what assistace required from Me.There wll be full support from me.Please go ahead.
Yuors sincerely,
S S Shirsi
SPOsPndharpur 413304
Email from Atul Tiwari
Dear Shri Tripathi ji,
Every listed member of the reasult list of passed candidates are worried about the decision
Shri V.M.Sakthivelu ADPS(Tech) O/O The CPMG Tamil Nadu Circle ,has taken the lead to stand on behalf of all of us.His mobile number is 09444227090. We are awaiting his further guide lines.Inbetween if any thing came to your notice please convey to me so that I can share it with our batchmates at Gujrat.
Thanks for mailing me.
ATUL TIWARI,SPO's SURENDRANAGAR-363002(GUJ) MOB: 09601534533
Every listed member of the reasult list of passed candidates are worried about the decision
Shri V.M.Sakthivelu ADPS(Tech) O/O The CPMG Tamil Nadu Circle ,has taken the lead to stand on behalf of all of us.His mobile number is 09444227090. We are awaiting his further guide lines.Inbetween if any thing came to your notice please convey to me so that I can share it with our batchmates at Gujrat.
Thanks for mailing me.
ATUL TIWARI,SPO's SURENDRANAGAR-363002(GUJ) MOB: 09601534533
Review by GS IP/ASP on CAT decision
CAT Madras holds the Group B examination held in 2008 as defective, arbitrary, irrational and discriminatory
Normally, any departmental examination for promotion is held every year depending upon year-wise vacancies sothat the eligible candidate for a particular year vacancy would get opportunity to sek selection for subsequent year vacancies. But disregarding all principles, the department conducted Group B examination by bunching of vacancies for four years viz. 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006. Our Association objected to it. But the Department did not heed. Some of IP/ASP filed cases before CAT Madras and CAT Patna and prayed for a stay order. The honourable CATs at that time rejected to pass stay order. Though the single selection for all the four years is prejudicial to majority of the eligible candidates the Department successfully conducted the examination. With a result many juniors who were not at all eligible for the vacancies of 2004, 2005 and 2006 were allowed to appear, got selected and promoted. Now many ineligible candidates are working as PS Group B officer. The CAT Madras passed an order in OA 64/08 and some of the relevant paragraphs are reproduced below:
“ 15. If the selection for promotion is based every year separately for 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006, depending upon year-wise vacancies, the eligible candidate for 2003 who did not get selection for the year vacancies, would get opportunity to seek selection for subsequent year vacancies and because of bunching of vacancies for all the four years and holding single selection is prejudicial to majority of the eligible candidate and such selection is detrimental to the eligible employees for whose purpose it has been intended. The respondents have not placed any instruction of guidelines in support their claim for holding the single selection by bunching of vacancies for 4 years or several years.
16. In view of such circumstances as discussed above, the decision to bunch the vacancies for all the four years together and holding a simple selection is discriminatory, arbitrary, unfair and also amounts to defect the selection.
17. In spite of objections raised by the applicants by way of representations an also by filing of this OA, the authorities have not taken any care and proceeded further in conducting examinations. The authorities have completed most of the selection procedure in conducting examination and also declared the result of the successful candidates in the written test.
18. In view of such circumstances, if this selection is restricted for the vacancies for the year 2003, no harm would be caused to any of the eligible candidates who faced the examination and selection for the year 2003 is held valid and the selection for the vacancies for 2004, 2005 and 2006 are held to be defective, arbitrary, irrational and discriminatory. Thus the claim of the applicants is allowed partly, directing the respondents to secure year-wise vacancies for the years 2004, 2005 and 2006 in respect of promotion to the cadre of Postal Services Group B by preparing year-wise list of eligible candidates and also vacancies and thereafter hold fresh Limited Departmental Competitive Examination (LDCE), restricting the present selection only for the year 2003.
19. In the result, the OA is partly allowed aas above, with no order as to costs.”
Note:
What is the use of this order? The Department has deliberately conducted this examination. No relief was given by the CAT to affected candidates at that time. Selected candidates have now promoted and working in the higher posts. Justice is supposed to be delivered in time
Justice delayed is Justice denied!
S.Samuel
General Secretary
NOTE - IS IT A FAIR REMARKS BY GS IP/ASP? THINK, CAN ASSOCIATION HELP US.WHY THEY ARE AGAINST THE SELECTED IPs, ARE THEY NOT A MEMBER OF IP/ASP ASSOCIATION.AS THERE IS NO LIMIT OF CHANCES FOR APPEARING IN PS EXAMINATION ,OFFICIALS WERE NOT SELECTED BY ANY REASON IN THE COMBAIND EXAM, CAN APPEAR IN THE NEXT EXAM AND GET PROMOTION.WHY ASSOCIATION IS AGAINST THE YOUNG TELENT. AS YOU KNOW ONLY 02 OFFICIALS OF GENERAL LINE WERE SELECTED AGAINST THE VACANCIES OF 29 IN THAT EXAM AS THE GENERAL LINE TELENT OFFICIALS HAD ALREADY BEEN SELECTED IN IP CADRE .WHY PSS GR.EXAM IS OPEN FOR
GENERAL LINE OFFICIALS, HOW BACK LOG VACANCIES OF GENERAL LINE FILLED? GS IP/ASP IS REQUESTED TO COME FORWARD WITH TELENT IP/ASP AND SEND PROPOSAL FOR FILLING OF ALL BACKLOG VACANIES OF GENERAL LINE FROM THE IP LINE. ALL IP PROMOTED FROM GENERAL LINE , WHY SEPARATE QUOTA FOR GENERAL LINE , IS SHOWS THAT ASSOCIATION IS ALWAY WITH THIRD BENCHERS.
GS IP/ASP IS HUMBLY REUESTED TO RECONSIDER THE ISSUE IN RIGHT PROSPECTIVE AND COME FORWARD WITH TELENT IP CADRE OFFICIALS WHO SELECTED PSS EXAM 2003-2006 . DEPARTMENT INTRODUCED EXAM FOR PSS FOR BETTERMENT OF TELENED IP CADRE OFFICIALS AND DEPARTMENT SO THAT DEPARTMENT CAN IMPLEMENT ALL POLICY IN FIELD EFFECTIVELY.
D K TRIPATHI
Normally, any departmental examination for promotion is held every year depending upon year-wise vacancies sothat the eligible candidate for a particular year vacancy would get opportunity to sek selection for subsequent year vacancies. But disregarding all principles, the department conducted Group B examination by bunching of vacancies for four years viz. 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006. Our Association objected to it. But the Department did not heed. Some of IP/ASP filed cases before CAT Madras and CAT Patna and prayed for a stay order. The honourable CATs at that time rejected to pass stay order. Though the single selection for all the four years is prejudicial to majority of the eligible candidates the Department successfully conducted the examination. With a result many juniors who were not at all eligible for the vacancies of 2004, 2005 and 2006 were allowed to appear, got selected and promoted. Now many ineligible candidates are working as PS Group B officer. The CAT Madras passed an order in OA 64/08 and some of the relevant paragraphs are reproduced below:
“ 15. If the selection for promotion is based every year separately for 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006, depending upon year-wise vacancies, the eligible candidate for 2003 who did not get selection for the year vacancies, would get opportunity to seek selection for subsequent year vacancies and because of bunching of vacancies for all the four years and holding single selection is prejudicial to majority of the eligible candidate and such selection is detrimental to the eligible employees for whose purpose it has been intended. The respondents have not placed any instruction of guidelines in support their claim for holding the single selection by bunching of vacancies for 4 years or several years.
16. In view of such circumstances as discussed above, the decision to bunch the vacancies for all the four years together and holding a simple selection is discriminatory, arbitrary, unfair and also amounts to defect the selection.
17. In spite of objections raised by the applicants by way of representations an also by filing of this OA, the authorities have not taken any care and proceeded further in conducting examinations. The authorities have completed most of the selection procedure in conducting examination and also declared the result of the successful candidates in the written test.
18. In view of such circumstances, if this selection is restricted for the vacancies for the year 2003, no harm would be caused to any of the eligible candidates who faced the examination and selection for the year 2003 is held valid and the selection for the vacancies for 2004, 2005 and 2006 are held to be defective, arbitrary, irrational and discriminatory. Thus the claim of the applicants is allowed partly, directing the respondents to secure year-wise vacancies for the years 2004, 2005 and 2006 in respect of promotion to the cadre of Postal Services Group B by preparing year-wise list of eligible candidates and also vacancies and thereafter hold fresh Limited Departmental Competitive Examination (LDCE), restricting the present selection only for the year 2003.
19. In the result, the OA is partly allowed aas above, with no order as to costs.”
Note:
What is the use of this order? The Department has deliberately conducted this examination. No relief was given by the CAT to affected candidates at that time. Selected candidates have now promoted and working in the higher posts. Justice is supposed to be delivered in time
Justice delayed is Justice denied!
S.Samuel
General Secretary
NOTE - IS IT A FAIR REMARKS BY GS IP/ASP? THINK, CAN ASSOCIATION HELP US.WHY THEY ARE AGAINST THE SELECTED IPs, ARE THEY NOT A MEMBER OF IP/ASP ASSOCIATION.AS THERE IS NO LIMIT OF CHANCES FOR APPEARING IN PS EXAMINATION ,OFFICIALS WERE NOT SELECTED BY ANY REASON IN THE COMBAIND EXAM, CAN APPEAR IN THE NEXT EXAM AND GET PROMOTION.WHY ASSOCIATION IS AGAINST THE YOUNG TELENT. AS YOU KNOW ONLY 02 OFFICIALS OF GENERAL LINE WERE SELECTED AGAINST THE VACANCIES OF 29 IN THAT EXAM AS THE GENERAL LINE TELENT OFFICIALS HAD ALREADY BEEN SELECTED IN IP CADRE .WHY PSS GR.EXAM IS OPEN FOR
GENERAL LINE OFFICIALS, HOW BACK LOG VACANCIES OF GENERAL LINE FILLED? GS IP/ASP IS REQUESTED TO COME FORWARD WITH TELENT IP/ASP AND SEND PROPOSAL FOR FILLING OF ALL BACKLOG VACANIES OF GENERAL LINE FROM THE IP LINE. ALL IP PROMOTED FROM GENERAL LINE , WHY SEPARATE QUOTA FOR GENERAL LINE , IS SHOWS THAT ASSOCIATION IS ALWAY WITH THIRD BENCHERS.
GS IP/ASP IS HUMBLY REUESTED TO RECONSIDER THE ISSUE IN RIGHT PROSPECTIVE AND COME FORWARD WITH TELENT IP CADRE OFFICIALS WHO SELECTED PSS EXAM 2003-2006 . DEPARTMENT INTRODUCED EXAM FOR PSS FOR BETTERMENT OF TELENED IP CADRE OFFICIALS AND DEPARTMENT SO THAT DEPARTMENT CAN IMPLEMENT ALL POLICY IN FIELD EFFECTIVELY.
D K TRIPATHI
Action plan- Move application under RTI case
Dear friends,
I moved application under RTI to CAT Chennai through ACPIO Pataila HO on 19-03-2010
D K Tripathi
I moved application under RTI to CAT Chennai through ACPIO Pataila HO on 19-03-2010
D K Tripathi
Thursday, March 18, 2010
CAT Chennai decision against PSS Exam2003-06
In view of such circumstances, if this selection is restricted for the vacancy for the year 2003, no harm would be caused to any of the eligible candidates who faced the examination and thus selection for the year 2003 is held valid and the selection for the vacancies for 2004,2005 and,2006 are held to be defective, arbitrary irrational and discriminatory. Thus the claim of the applicants is allowed partly, directing the respondent to declare year wise vacancies for the years 2004,2005,2006 i9n respect of promotion to the cadre of P.S.S. Group B by preparing year wise list of eligible candidates and also vacancies and thereafter hold fresh Limited Departmental Competitive Examination9(LDCE) restricting the present selection only for the vacancies for the year 2003.
In result, the OA is partly allowed as above, with no order as to costs.
Updated by GS, IRM / ASRM Association at 12:35 AM
Dear friends
We are ,PS Officers of batch 2003-+06 , are likely to be effected . We have to unite and join hands for struggle . Association alway with inefficent members, we are got the status by hard working and on merit examination and there is no hope from the association side either IP/ASP or PS officers association.
02. Please convey the message amongst the batchmet 2003-06.
03. Move an application under RTI by all batchmets and get certified copy from CAT Chennai.
04. Make effects to obtain copy of judgement from the counterparts of chennai.
05.Study the judgement and consult with learned advocate at CAT Hq.
06. File an appeal in High Court ( atleast in 02 Delhi/ other ) against the order of CAT within a month.
07. All members are requested to donate atleast RsFive Thousand) to the member who filed appeal in the High Court. Member is requested to intimate his Bank account number so that amount can be deposited in account directly.
08 I am going on leave for one month and stay at Ajmer .
09. Keep liasion with all batchmet and make personal talk with each other and take concrete decision without wasting time.
10 Offer your views on this blog so that every memeber can read and study on views.
Join hands for struggle
Yours
D K Tripathi
Sr. Postmaster
PATAILA (PUNJAB)
Mob. 9465658358 (Pataila) 9414007995 (Ajmer)
In result, the OA is partly allowed as above, with no order as to costs.
Updated by GS, IRM / ASRM Association at 12:35 AM
Dear friends
We are ,PS Officers of batch 2003-+06 , are likely to be effected . We have to unite and join hands for struggle . Association alway with inefficent members, we are got the status by hard working and on merit examination and there is no hope from the association side either IP/ASP or PS officers association.
02. Please convey the message amongst the batchmet 2003-06.
03. Move an application under RTI by all batchmets and get certified copy from CAT Chennai.
04. Make effects to obtain copy of judgement from the counterparts of chennai.
05.Study the judgement and consult with learned advocate at CAT Hq.
06. File an appeal in High Court ( atleast in 02 Delhi/ other ) against the order of CAT within a month.
07. All members are requested to donate atleast RsFive Thousand) to the member who filed appeal in the High Court. Member is requested to intimate his Bank account number so that amount can be deposited in account directly.
08 I am going on leave for one month and stay at Ajmer .
09. Keep liasion with all batchmet and make personal talk with each other and take concrete decision without wasting time.
10 Offer your views on this blog so that every memeber can read and study on views.
Join hands for struggle
Yours
D K Tripathi
Sr. Postmaster
PATAILA (PUNJAB)
Mob. 9465658358 (Pataila) 9414007995 (Ajmer)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
